<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is UP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/</link>
	<description>For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind. 2 Timothy 1:7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Observin'</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-14828</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Observin'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-14828</guid>
		<description>Well, now I understand why I once got whomped with a cyber-copy of the 1828 Webster&#039;s on a Christian ladies&#039; discussion list.  It was about 4 years ago - yes, around 2005 - and I was on the outside for having the temerity to assert that indeed, a person could be a Christian and a feminist.

I just kept thinking, &quot;1828? But Jane Austen was already dead  by then!&quot;

I know, it didn&#039;t make any sense, but neither did the other poster&#039;s infatuation with the 1828 Webster&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now I understand why I once got whomped with a cyber-copy of the 1828 Webster&#8217;s on a Christian ladies&#8217; discussion list.  It was about 4 years ago &#8211; yes, around 2005 &#8211; and I was on the outside for having the temerity to assert that indeed, a person could be a Christian and a feminist.</p>
<p>I just kept thinking, &#8220;1828? But Jane Austen was already dead  by then!&#8221;</p>
<p>I know, it didn&#8217;t make any sense, but neither did the other poster&#8217;s infatuation with the 1828 Webster&#8217;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-14705</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-14705</guid>
		<description>Do I read this right?  The Webster 1828 is Divinely Inspired just like the 1611 KJV?

&lt;i&gt;Anyway, maybe this dictionary thing really is like the KJV-only controversy.  Do I see the book “New Age Dictionaries” being published in the future?  At this point, nothing would surprise me.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s because in a time of extreme push-the-envelope True Believers, nothing is too extreme and parody is impossible.

As far as you push into absurdity for parody and humor, there is some unsmiling True Believer out there who will push farther beyond absurdity and be Dead Serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I read this right?  The Webster 1828 is Divinely Inspired just like the 1611 KJV?</p>
<p><i>Anyway, maybe this dictionary thing really is like the KJV-only controversy.  Do I see the book “New Age Dictionaries” being published in the future?  At this point, nothing would surprise me.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because in a time of extreme push-the-envelope True Believers, nothing is too extreme and parody is impossible.</p>
<p>As far as you push into absurdity for parody and humor, there is some unsmiling True Believer out there who will push farther beyond absurdity and be Dead Serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birthathomemom</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-14607</link>
		<dc:creator>birthathomemom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-14607</guid>
		<description>I have this dictionary, and use it to help understand authors who wrote back in that time period.  I also have a few other new dictionaries.  Language changes, and so does our understanding of it.  Certain words&#039; meanings change over time, so what I think something means, may not be exactly what an author was intending.

I do think there is merit to the old book if only to seek understanding, but you can get the thing for free on the internet.

I have no idea why this would be second in importance to the Bible... now that is quite a bit off base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this dictionary, and use it to help understand authors who wrote back in that time period.  I also have a few other new dictionaries.  Language changes, and so does our understanding of it.  Certain words&#8217; meanings change over time, so what I think something means, may not be exactly what an author was intending.</p>
<p>I do think there is merit to the old book if only to seek understanding, but you can get the thing for free on the internet.</p>
<p>I have no idea why this would be second in importance to the Bible&#8230; now that is quite a bit off base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne2</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-13192</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-13192</guid>
		<description>Okay, Johnny come late to this discussion but had some time today to catch up reading.  

Dana!  
Your remark on  Rod and &quot;his&quot; Staff made my day.  What a hoot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Johnny come late to this discussion but had some time today to catch up reading.  </p>
<p>Dana!<br />
Your remark on  Rod and &#8220;his&#8221; Staff made my day.  What a hoot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrie</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10888</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10888</guid>
		<description>&quot; The Bible doesn’t answer every question.  It doesn’t even answer most questions.  I look to it for the answers it intends to give, not the ones I project onto it.&quot;

Cally,

Very profound.

Excellent post and discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; The Bible doesn’t answer every question.  It doesn’t even answer most questions.  I look to it for the answers it intends to give, not the ones I project onto it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cally,</p>
<p>Very profound.</p>
<p>Excellent post and discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molleth</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>molleth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>Dulce,
Thanks for the history lesson.  Cool.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dulce,<br />
Thanks for the history lesson.  Cool.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cally Tyrol</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>Cally Tyrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>Christian Reconstructionists like Doug Phillips believe that America (at least at its founding and up to the &quot;War of Northern Aggression&quot; - a title I think is very telling) and Christianity are synonymous.  American culture WAS Christian culture.  This is why they are always trying to get back to the good old days.  Of course, there are more holes in that idea than there are in a block of Swiss Cheese, but that&#039;s what they believe nonetheless.

I&#039;m a big believer that VF (and probably just about every company in the WORLD) regularly engages in this marketing trick- creating the problem so they can sell you the solution:  

College is evil and it will turn your daughters (but not your sons) into God-hating feminists!  What should they do instead?  Here&#039;s a book for you!  Do Americal Girl dolls give you the creeps because their parent company funds programs you don&#039;t like?  We&#039;ll sell you alternative dolls and your money can go to helping us win the culture war!  Can&#039;t decide between the Constitution Party candidate and the Republican?  Well GOD himself has principles for voting- you must obey them, they are found in the Bible- and we&#039;ll SELL you the information for $16.99.  A modern dictionary isn&#039;t good enough because its been corrupted by 150 years of secularism and God-hating culture.  Buy THIS dictionary and we&#039;ll sell it to you!  This dictionary uses Bible verses to define words therefore it must be better.

I have no problem with the dictionary itself.  Heck, I&#039;ll probably buy one at some point because it is actual quite an important work, historically.  If Doug Phillips loves this dictionary, wonderful!  Yay!  But saying that its the second most important book in your home is a bit fo a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian Reconstructionists like Doug Phillips believe that America (at least at its founding and up to the &#8220;War of Northern Aggression&#8221; &#8211; a title I think is very telling) and Christianity are synonymous.  American culture WAS Christian culture.  This is why they are always trying to get back to the good old days.  Of course, there are more holes in that idea than there are in a block of Swiss Cheese, but that&#8217;s what they believe nonetheless.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big believer that VF (and probably just about every company in the WORLD) regularly engages in this marketing trick- creating the problem so they can sell you the solution:  </p>
<p>College is evil and it will turn your daughters (but not your sons) into God-hating feminists!  What should they do instead?  Here&#8217;s a book for you!  Do Americal Girl dolls give you the creeps because their parent company funds programs you don&#8217;t like?  We&#8217;ll sell you alternative dolls and your money can go to helping us win the culture war!  Can&#8217;t decide between the Constitution Party candidate and the Republican?  Well GOD himself has principles for voting- you must obey them, they are found in the Bible- and we&#8217;ll SELL you the information for $16.99.  A modern dictionary isn&#8217;t good enough because its been corrupted by 150 years of secularism and God-hating culture.  Buy THIS dictionary and we&#8217;ll sell it to you!  This dictionary uses Bible verses to define words therefore it must be better.</p>
<p>I have no problem with the dictionary itself.  Heck, I&#8217;ll probably buy one at some point because it is actual quite an important work, historically.  If Doug Phillips loves this dictionary, wonderful!  Yay!  But saying that its the second most important book in your home is a bit fo a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulce Domum</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10818</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulce Domum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10818</guid>
		<description>Ouch! Sorry about the typos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! Sorry about the typos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulce Domum</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulce Domum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10816</guid>
		<description>Ooh, I&#039;m quite excited about commenting on this, because I know a little about the history of dictionaries (yes, I am fun at parties)!

First, the first comprehensive disctionary of the English language was started by Samuel Johnson in 1755, it took him 9 years to complete it. It was commissioned by a group of London booksellers who were desperate to standardise English spelling and grammar, which varied greatly from county to county, let alone how it was used in Scotland, Ireland and Wales. It was not a political undertaking but a commerical one. A comprehensive dictionary was needed at a time when the publication of printed materials was exlpoding - it&#039;s a time akin to the one we&#039;re in today, where there was this brand new method of communicating which was both exciting and troublesome - also, and concurrent with, this explosion in publishing was massive rise in literacy, the average man and woman could now read.

The Johson dictionary was used in America for many years, however its use irked Webster, who felt that the dictionary was as currupt as the country and literature from which it originated. He wrote the 1828 Webster dictionary as an attempt to assert a distinctive American cultural identity, it was an attempt to claim an American language, freeing it from the shackles of British imperialism. He understood that language and culture were intimately intwined. Now, I may be leaping to a few too many conclusions here, but aren&#039;t dominionist Christians all about asserting a distinctive Christian (and America) culture? Is this why it appeals so?

Also, isn&#039;t the 1828 Webster  a friend of American lawyers and is often used in the legislature? When they discuss and evolve laws they need to know the original definition of the words used when the law was first made, with all its original cultureal nuances. Isn&#039;t Mr Phillips a lawyer? Considering his profession and personal beliefs I imagine the Webster appeals to something deep within his soul...oh, and don&#039;t we all feel that way about our favourite books?

Yours sincerely

Dictionary Nerd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, I&#8217;m quite excited about commenting on this, because I know a little about the history of dictionaries (yes, I am fun at parties)!</p>
<p>First, the first comprehensive disctionary of the English language was started by Samuel Johnson in 1755, it took him 9 years to complete it. It was commissioned by a group of London booksellers who were desperate to standardise English spelling and grammar, which varied greatly from county to county, let alone how it was used in Scotland, Ireland and Wales. It was not a political undertaking but a commerical one. A comprehensive dictionary was needed at a time when the publication of printed materials was exlpoding &#8211; it&#8217;s a time akin to the one we&#8217;re in today, where there was this brand new method of communicating which was both exciting and troublesome &#8211; also, and concurrent with, this explosion in publishing was massive rise in literacy, the average man and woman could now read.</p>
<p>The Johson dictionary was used in America for many years, however its use irked Webster, who felt that the dictionary was as currupt as the country and literature from which it originated. He wrote the 1828 Webster dictionary as an attempt to assert a distinctive American cultural identity, it was an attempt to claim an American language, freeing it from the shackles of British imperialism. He understood that language and culture were intimately intwined. Now, I may be leaping to a few too many conclusions here, but aren&#8217;t dominionist Christians all about asserting a distinctive Christian (and America) culture? Is this why it appeals so?</p>
<p>Also, isn&#8217;t the 1828 Webster  a friend of American lawyers and is often used in the legislature? When they discuss and evolve laws they need to know the original definition of the words used when the law was first made, with all its original cultureal nuances. Isn&#8217;t Mr Phillips a lawyer? Considering his profession and personal beliefs I imagine the Webster appeals to something deep within his soul&#8230;oh, and don&#8217;t we all feel that way about our favourite books?</p>
<p>Yours sincerely</p>
<p>Dictionary Nerd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Esther</title>
		<link>http://whitewashedfeminist.wordpress.com/2009/06/22/what-is-up/#comment-10802</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitewashedfeminist.com/?p=719#comment-10802</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a clever marketing trick, isn&#039;t it? Getting people to buy your books, CDs, DVDs and OUTDATED dictionaries by promising them Christian Utopia circa 1863? Minus, of course, the pesky facts (slavery? what slavery? who? huh?).

Yeah. Who&#039;s whitewashing history now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a clever marketing trick, isn&#8217;t it? Getting people to buy your books, CDs, DVDs and OUTDATED dictionaries by promising them Christian Utopia circa 1863? Minus, of course, the pesky facts (slavery? what slavery? who? huh?).</p>
<p>Yeah. Who&#8217;s whitewashing history now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
