This page is meant to be a basic breakdown of what we here at WWF believe and hold to. This list is not exhaustive and we will add to it as issues arise that we wish to clarify our stance on.
Theology:
The Whitewashed Feminists have different theological backgrounds, but all agree that the core of Christianity is summed up in the Nicene Creed.
We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he became incarnate from the Virgin Mary,
and was made man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered death and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in accordance with the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father.
With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
We also affirm the ultimate Authority of the Bible and look to it as God’s infallible instruction for faith and practice. If our beliefs do not conform to God’s Holy Word, we must change our beliefs.
Women:
We believe that women bear the same image of God that a man does and that their value is far more than the ability to bear children. We reject the idea that a woman’s only worthwhile contribution is in the home as a daughter, wife, or mother. Not that those roles aren’t important, but they are not the sole defining characteristic of women nor are they the calling of every woman.
Abortion:
We are firmly pro-life. This means that we recognize the inherent value of every person created by God and oppose elective abortion on demand. We do, however, understand that sometimes mothers must make hard choices to protect their lives. We also understand that many women encounter dark times in their lives when they believe that no option is available to them, other than abortion. We do not feel that we have any business judging decisions made in the darkest points in ones life, or in the deepest despair. All people need the compassion of Christ.
Parenting:
We understand that different families can have different philosophies on child rearing that work for their families. But we denounce vehemently the works of the Pearls, the Ezzos, and Ted Tripp. We do not believe that any of these authors are teaching God’s way to parent. More than that, these parenting methods carry with them risk for abuse.
We parent using the “one anothers” of Scripture and treat their children with the respect and dignity with which they would like to be treated.
Homeschooling:
We affirm God’s command to teach the Faith to our children (Deut. 6). We believe that each family must decide for themselves how this is to be done. We do not believe that homeschooling is for every family. We do not believe that God calls for or commands homeschooling. Public and private schooling are valid options and work for some families as homeschooling works for others.
Comments:
We believe that the best way to begin to bridge the divide between the way we see things and the way the Patrios see things is through open dialog. Comments that disagree with us are welcome. We simply ask that you refrain from personal attacks.




Awesome! Nice to know I’m not alone. =)
And I home school, but I hope you won’t hold it against me.
As a homeschooling mom myself, I wouldn’t dream of it, LaDonna.
We just wanted to be clear that homeschooling isn’t something one has to do to be a believer.
I really appreciate your beliefs articulated in print.
I agree with everything mentioned.
Even the thing about cultivating an open dialog with Patrists
Thank you for publishing this blog. I am a believer, have been so for most of my life. I stay at home with my three (hopefully more!) small children and am a wife to the most wonderful man in the whole wide word. I also hold a law degree and work part-time as an attorney, working for a local public interest firm providing services to those who can not afford them. I know the Lord has met the desires of my heart by giving me both the opportunities of parenting my children full-time and working to his glory on an as-needed basis with my firm. While I believe so many are called to not work outside the home at all – and it may be a biblical calling at that – I do not believe that the opposite or any variation that is actually anti-Biblical. The Bible may allow for one expression of “womanhood,” while equally allowing for another. Thank you for this website. I find acceptance and truth here.
Melissa
I think I’ve finally found my cyber-home.
Melissa,
Amen, sister. I was a sahm for my eight children for 25 years and when my youngest went to Kindergarten, I went back to school. I love it. I must scoot because I am due in the lab for some research!!
Life is good because God is good!
Groups touting the term “feminist” can be approached (often wrongly) with skepticism, so I immediately came to this page to find out exactly “what you believe”.
I was refreshed to read such biblical and righteous beliefs on the role of women in the world. Thanks for being a voice for change!
Wow. More smart, Christian women in the blogosphere! I’m glad I found you. FYI, I’ve been a Christian for most of my adult life. I’m trained as a family physician, but I’ve been a stay at home homeschooling mom for the last three years due to disability (chronic headaches and frequent severe migraines). I love books, knitting, and lots of other domestic stuff. I hope that God one day allows me to go back to work – I loved it and truly believed that He was using me in our community. But, in any case, I am learning to be content and to serve wherever I am. And, being a mom is awesome! I love your site – thanks for the support of thinking Christian women.
My province is considering passing a law allowing parents to take their children out of classes that discuss evolution, sexual education and sexuality.
I notice many of you choose home schooling. I would like your insight as to why certain topics are seen as a threat to christians, and why christian parents would chose to censor what their children learn at school.
Some people suggest it is because their children will learn immoral values, thoughts, etc. that do not support their religious beliefs (christianity, etc.). I question that any parent would assume their child would not be able to formulate their own informed opinion, and disregard what they know not to be in support of the teachings of their particular god. Is it seen as a test? Is there a concern that the public school system is so powerful it will turn children away from their spiritual beliefs and undo the work of the church? Are parents not confident that their children will learn and prosper and turn away non-christian teachings?
In particular to sexual education, are christian children not taught about sex? Are christian women uninformed until they are married and then must learn everything from their husband as in the morman faith?
Your insight and input is appreciated. Thank you!
Hi, Lindsey. First of all, let me say that it’s hard for me to answer for all Christians or all homeschooling Christian parents. Homeschooling is often a very personal choice and made for many reasons. And it’s chosen by all kinds of parents, all faiths, no faith, and by both liberal and conservative. So the answers to your questions will be very different based on who you ask.
If we’re homeschooling, we’re not really censoring what our children learn in school, because they’re not in school. I’m somewhat of an oddity however, because I have two sons on the Autism spectrum and I have them both in the public school system. My oldest has full days and my pre-schooler does half days in a special education class. At this time I’m not censoring what either of them learn.
You may question whether or not children will be able to hold to what they’re taught at home, and that is also a difficult question. Some will, some won’t. Children are young and their minds impressionable. And there can be a lot of pressure to conform in the public school system. Many of us witnessed that struggle in friends, or even saw it in ourselves. Those experiences shaped how we feel and how we raise our children. Being cautious about what your children learn and when they learn it is no different to me than looking out for what movies they see based on their maturity level.
My children are taught about sex. From a very early age, actually. Of course the conversations start as basic understanding of their bodies. The information gets more complex as they get older and can better understand. Each stage is age appropriate and meets their need for understanding. It is also taught with an understanding of what our faith believes about sex. That it’s a beautiful gift and one that comes with responsibility. It hasn’t been my experience that Christian women are uninformed about sex when they marry (nor Mormon women, either, I think you may be thinking about the Fundamentalist Mormon sects) but that doesn’t mean it never happens. Again, it’s hard for me to answer for such a large and diverse group of people.
Lindsey, it is commonly accepted that parents have both the responsibility and the freedom to raise and educate their children — and established schools and other community structures exist in an effort to aid that. “It takes a village” has great merit, but the primary responsibilities for children fall to the parents (with community safety nets to help prevent neglect and abuse.)
Within that view of parental responsibility, it is commonsensical to encourage parents to be involved in community-based education, which at times may include parents choosing to have their children opt-out of certain classes. In countries such as the US, this would especially hold true in situations that would be matters of religious and philosophical freedom.
In the late 80s, my parents opted to have me sit out of the science unit on sex ed in 6th grade. I had plenty of one-on-one discussions with my parents about adolescence, growth, development, relationships and other facets of sex ed. It wouldn’t be a stretch to say I had a more thorough sex ed course than my peers. It was their view that relationship and sexuality education happened best within the family and in a more private setting than a room full of juvenile elementary students.
As it turned out, I later was greatly involved in sex ed in both schools and community groups — often being the outside speaker brought in to lead discussions and broach topics teachers wanted to avoid. I always insisted on a letter being sent to parents to inform them of the topics we’d be covering and invite them to talk with me beforehand or choose to opt their child out of the class. I spoke with people who ranged in age from from 3rd grade to college aged.
In spite of that (or perhaps a result of that?) I believe that sexuality and relationship education occurs optimally in small, family, and respectful contexts. Not all children have the optimal situation, but certainly parents ought to be free to choose that over classroom instruction.
I found this blog after a long day of wading through some very strange (to me) places on the net. Patriarchal beliefs, complementarianism, spiritual abuse of all shapes and sizes. I had seen my own practice of Christianity struck down over and over by those who seemingly revel in believing they have all of the answers and who seem to believe that everyone who doesn’t live “their way” is doomed. It was quite an education. But I also confess that I couldn’t tear myself away.
I have been a Believer for 26 years (meaning, for the sake of brevity, that I have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, adhere to the Apostles’/Nicene Creed, and seek to know God more through his Word). I have been married to a wonderful Christian man for 27 years and we have raised three honorable Christian sons – all of whom went through the public school system. We serve God and each other based on giftedness, not gender. I guess that is called “egalitarian”. Whatever, I’ll take it. If it means that no one ever gets to pull the “because I said so because I’m the man” card, then that’s what we do, as there is no problem (and we’ve had plenty of speedbumps along the road of life to be sure) that can’t be mutually solved with enough discussion, prayer, and humility.
I have a business degree and was a SAHM until my youngest children were in school. Since then we’ve been a two-income family. Just as an aside.
So according to a lot of these websites, I’m not a very good Christian woman/wife – or perhaps I’m not a Christian at all in the eyes of some. My husband would be judged as. . . what? I don’t know, weak? Because he doesn’t force his will down the throat of those he loves or takes seriously that he has been called to love me as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for her? Because we are reasonable, educated people who can’t understand this obsession with “leading” or “being led”? Is this really that big of problem? I truly can’t imagine!
So would I be a white-washed feminist, according to the belief statement of this website? I guess. To me, feminism is just the radical idea that women are fully human, so on that count, guilty as charged. Is my view that of “evangelical feminism”? I guess. I don’t look at whose advise or instruction I’m going to take based upon their chromosomal makeup. I look for godliness, good judgment, sound reasoning, ect. Honestly, there are some men in my church who I wouldn’t take advice from on how to swat a fly. Let’s face it: being a man doesn’t make one smart or able. Nor does being a woman. So why should that be the dominant reason for any division of roles or authority?
I guess I’m just struck by the hubris of so many women who have chosen (or been coerced – I truly don’t know) a subordinate lifestyle who then want to tell other women that they “just don’t know what they’re missing”. Sorry – it doesn’t sound all that great. With names like “true womanhood” and worse – who are they trying to convince? Themselves? What are the rest of us? False women? Fake women? My husband and sons would disagree.
Sorry about the rant. Honestly, before today, I didn’t realize the extent to which this was all going on in the broader Church/Christendom. Ultimately, people should live out their Christianity however they see fit. I truly believe that. If it’s a choice, then I’m all for it. I would just exhort those who make these choices to be very careful of developing a prideful spirit, in that that is the ONLY way.
Because if the proof is in the pudding, it’s certainly not.
Correction: I’ve been a believer for 36 years – not that it matters – just a typo, though.
In doing some additional research last night, I realized that I mischaracterized the “true womanhood” blog in my post above. By Sunday night, I had looked at so many of these blogs that they had begun to run together in my mind. I now recognize that the “true womanhood” blog is not a good example of a blog that, in the apparent pursuit of extreme legalism, tries to set a “standard of [Biblical] womanhood”. In my interim reading, I have found many smart, independent-thinking women over there.
A better example for me to use would have been a blog like “Your Sacred Calling” (inaptly named, if you ask me).
So please accept my apology for misspeaking.
Peace,
S
“We believe that women bear the same image of God that a man does”
Thank you for this. When I read it it took my breath and brought me to tears. Valuing myself as a woman is newer to me and I’m excited to have found this place!
Why this site or movement called White Washed feminists? What is the meaning behind White Washed? This term is typically means to cover up crimes or to pardon immoral action through bogus or false presentation of evidence. It also can be taken to mean a person of color who denounces their culture, religion or language to act like a white person. Neither of these common understandings of this phrase seems appropriate to what is being discussed.
Can someone explain what exactly White Washed means?
What is the significance of this term? Why was it chosen?
Oh ridiculous ones. To think that there is an issue of men vs women here with God. Good grief….He created us BOTH in HIS image and likeness. Go to a Bible and see for yourselves.
Thank you so much for this blog and helping other Christian women know that we are not alone in our belief that we are our husband and father’s equals. YEAH! Thank you for sharing your views on child rearing too and for being open and understanding to the trials and tribulations that life can bring and the compassion needed in dark times!!! I’m very encouraged by what I’ve read so far and I thank you for giving us a place to stand tall and know that we are the same!!!
Hi! I happen to be a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and I am happy/sad after reading the comments written by others on this blog. Please forgive me if what I say doesn’t agree with you. The truth is that after reading the comments written by many well meaning people (people who remind me of the many friends I have made in Oregon and upstate New York), I am happy to share so many beliefs with people who do not share my faith, but I am saddened to realize that these same people who do not share my faith seem to believe that I am not a Christian. Also, one commentor seems to believe that in order for me to be a “Mormon”, then I surely was uneducated regarding sex until after I was married and was therefore overprotected. I just wanted those who read this to know that I do consider myself a “Mormon” and a Christian as well because I believe in Jesus Christ. I also believe in Heavenly Father and in the Holy Spirit. My scriptures include both the King James version of The Holy Bible and The Book of Mormon as well as The Doctrine and Covenants and The Pearl of Great Price. I believe that all of these scriptures agree with each other and support and testify of the divinity of Jesus Christ and his Atonement. I am saddened when people advertised that “Mormon” women aren’t Christian because I believe it to be a falsehood which attempts to exclude me personally from a sisterhood of wonderful Christian women. Please graciously receive this piece of advice from a well meaning Christian woman: It is better to include someone than to exclude them. Find what the common bond is and then build upon it. In order to find the common bond, ask questions and be confident that the Holy Spirit guides.
I have come into this place quite by accident. I suppose I may be the “enemy” being a male grandfather married to the same woman almost 40 years, and even worse – not hating Vision Forum, or the more traditional Christian view of the family. I freely admit that reading the works of “Christian feminists” has not been at the leading edge of my concern or preference. It seems to me, as a layman (sorry, layperson) in these matters that the fuss about such issues always seems to come from the extremel liberal side of Christianity. That is, the side that eschews the import of ITim3 and kindred Scripture in regards to male leadership,and in fact, pretty much denies Scripture the rightful place of authority…where it’s truth casts a shadow over feminist dogma. I might add, it seems to me that often “one issue Christians” tend to ignore so much else that is important in never-ending angst over their primary issue. At any rate, I guess I’ll come back and read thru all this when I have more time. Perhaps I misunderstood some things. Or worse yet, perhaps I failed to grasp the true depth of variance from “the faith once delivered to the saints.” Regards.